It has come to light that Jackson is looking for a five-year deal worth $50 million with 30 million guaranteed. While the Chargers offered Jackson a one-year tender at $3.268 million. To this point Jackson has refused to sign the tender and is holding out until further notice.

Calm June 15 Jackson’s tender was reduced to $583,000, and on August 20 Jackson was moved to the roster exempt list and if he signs he will be suspended for the first three games of the 2010 season.

To make matters worse, Jackson has already been suspended for the first three games of the season by the NFL office because of a DUI in San Diego. Jackson pleaded guilty to the San Diego DUI case which was his second San Diego DUI since 2006.

Fortunately at the time Jackson had a good San Diego DUI attorney to take care of his DUI case. Now, it is up to him and the Chargers to come to an agreement on this coming 2010 football season.

Once the DUI attorneys first argument is made, the following arguments must remain consistent and support the main argument. If a San Diego DUI Attorney fails to do this, they can come across as being sneaky or unorganized.

It is never a wise choice to argue that your defendant was hardly over the legal limit, as this tries to make room for a gray area when one does not exist. You are either guilty or not guilty, and the jury will determine which one you are. You cannot be “a little bit” guilty. If this is your approach, it would be a better idea to negotiate a bargain with the prosecutor rather than taking your case to trial.

On a similar frame, do not try to argue that the defendant did not realize they were over the legal limit, as it is irrelevant. If the defendant is over the legal drinking age than they are an adult, and therefore responsible for their decisions. As a helpful side note, it is not a good idea to refer to the breathalyzer device as either an “instrument” or a “machine” as both of these terms are thought of to be accurate.

It would be much more wise to described the results that were given by the equipment and argue how it is not completely accurate, as breathalyzer devices do not test this for blood alcohol levels but rather gives an estimate based off of the persons breath. The fact is, this will vary greatly between people, as one individuals results can actually display as much as 180% more alcohol on their breath as another person with the exact same BAC.

When battling a breathalyzer test in court and try not to use boring and scientific type terms such as, margin of error. A much more effective technique with the jury is to give them the results in a possible range. For example, when an individual drinks X number of alcoholic beverages, their blood alcohol level can register anywhere between X and X. This will be much easier understood and more effective in court. Another important tip is to never attack the arresting officer for being biased unless you have proof. The vast majority of jurors will not believe that claim.

Another good point to note, is rather than attacking the police officer’s integrity, it is a better idea to discuss the correct breathalyzer procedures and show to the jury how the police officer didn’t follow them. A good example would be, that the rules state the officer must wait near the driver for 15 to 20 minutes prior to administering the breathalyzer test, because if the driver has consumed certain foods or burped, the test can give an incorrect reading and actually show higher results than are true.

It is critical that you really drive the point home that breathalyzer equipment and field sobriety tests are different in different cities, frequently show a false positive, and are definitely not perfect. Because, if the jury is convinced these procedures are perfect, it will prove to be very difficult to change their mind.

Are you trying to find the best deal on a San Diego DUI attorney, then visit www.sandiegoduiattorneynow.com to find the best advice from a skilled San Diego DUI Lawyer for you.